Guest Post: Alle on Gdeim Izzeik and the Western Sahara

As a rule, this blogger tries to comment on the Western Sahara only minimally, mostly for lack of deep personal interest and partly because of its contentious nature. And yet it is a key issue in regional politics and is all too often neglected in the popular mind outside of the region — even as tensions and worrying trends seem to rise — as the Arabist noted last week.

The following is a guest post by Alle, a long-time friend of the blog, comments haunt and veteran Sahara watcher of Western Sahara Info and Maghreb Politics Review fame (both now defunct). He prepared this quick (though not short) analysis for TMND. The views below are his alone.

As Maghreb-watchers reading this blog are undoubtedly aware, the past few days in Moroccan-occupied Western Sahara have been violent.


A protest camp of traditional Sahrawi tents was recently set up in Gdeim Izzeik outside the region’s capital, El Aaiun, and it quickly filled up with Sahrawi families. The most recent estimates was that some 12,000 people from El Aaiun and neighbouring communities had relocated there. This is a big protest by any measure, and particularly given the form chosen: not a one-off demonstration, but a commitment to live for weeks in the desert. Also, huge, given the small size of the Sahrawi population in the territory, of some 200,000 people (including more Moroccan Sahrawi immigrants). And all this in a territory were the mere hint of even peaceful political dissent could land a Sahrawi in jail or worse.

Interestingly, the demands of the protesters were not overtly political. Rather, the organizers focused on economic demands, such as jobs and investment in the territory, and appear to have kept their distance from overtly pro-POLISARIO forces. Even so, POLISARIO has persistently tried to paint the protests as being mainly about independence, in its international propaganda. But, on the ground, the group seems to have settled for supporting the movement, on the argument that it’s better to try and use and influence this impressive popular mobilization than spend their energy trying to control it.

It’s easy to see why. While the thrust of the protest was about economical demands, there was also clearly an undercurrent of nationalism – asking for Sahrawi natural resources to be directed to the Sahara rather than Morocco is not an innocent proposition in this conflict. And as the weeks went by, the self-conscious affirmation of Sahrawi national identity in a state of semi-rebellion against the Moroccan army, obviously began to take on a political importance of its own.

While there were no Sahrawi flags flying over the camps, neither were there Moroccan flags. Had these protests been as non-political as Morocco claims, red-green flags and pictures of the king would have been displayed everywhere to ward off the evil eye of the authorities. That was not the case, in what should be considered a rather significant statement by omission.


It was after the king’s speech on the anniversary of the Green March that police started readying for an assault on the camp, which had previously been surrounded by military units and road blocks to prevent access. A fourteen year-old Sahrawi kid had already been shot to death, in what may have been an attempt to run the roadblocks. Now, on November 8, the camps were invaded by police.

Sahrawi activists have always been surprisingly Internet-savvy, and there are already some dramatic videos up on YouTube.

The raid appears to have immediately triggered resistance, and swiftly spread to neighbouring el-Aaiun. In a first for Moroccan-controlled Western Sahara’s social and political protest movement, violence immediately became lethal. During the past 24 hours, three Moroccan police and civil defense men have been stabbed to death, while numerous Moroccans and Sahrawis have been injured – conflicting figures circulate about Sahrawi deaths as well. At least one dead Sahrawi has been named by POLISARIO, but Morocco denies it.

It’s much too early, and I’m much too far away, to analyze this in any serious fashion, but I believe a few things should be said:

This is without a doubt a very significant moment for Sahrawi nationalism. Exactly how things will play out remains to be seen, but the violent nature of the crackdown and the protests, and the scale of public protest, is unprecedented. I believe this will become as significant an internal turning point for Sahrawi nationalism as the May 2005 Sahrawi “intifada” in el-Aaiun. While that event passed unnoticed in the larger world, it was the starting point of the recurrent Sahrawi protests and human rights lobbying that has since dominated the nationalist side of the argument, and it has seriously affected the parameters of the conflict.

The 2005 events were also vitally important in changing Morocco’s own perspective. Civil society and the press began to open up to the Sahrawi argument and the old line that Sahrawi dissent is entirely artificial, and all protesters are paid agents of Algeria, was discredited. It was with an eye to the 2005 protests that Morocco began developing a plan for internal autonomy, in the hope of substituting it for the international community’s demand for a referendum on independence.

In addition, the riots are a damning declaration of non-confidence in the official structures of governance in the territory, in particular the CORCAS, Morocco’s only officially sanctioned political entity for Sahrawis. CORCAS was already widely scorned as a powerless puppet body of corrupt local businessmen and pawns for palace and army interests, but it contained several influential local powerbrokers of Sahrawi or related provenance. The political significance of this should not be understated, since the CORCAS was long portrayed by the palace as the cornerstone of the whole autonomy project. The riots will certainly affect the plans to reform CORCAS (which have been long in the offing).

However, it does seem like the Gdeim Izzeik camp had the backing of at least some local strongmen, inside or outside of CORCAS, tribal or otherwise. It is a possibility that the protests were encouraged by such power brokers who felt that they were losing out in the game of influence, and who wanted to demonstrate their importance by giving or withholding aid to the state as protests spiralled out of hand. Palace-sponsored local leaders, including such people as Khellihenna ould Errachid, Hassan Derham and lots of tribal bosses, have been built up as a counter-force to POLISARIO since 1975, into an overlapping web of clientelist networks exploited by various “clans” within the larger Moroccan state. But of course, at the end of the day, few of these loyalist leaders appear very ideologically committed to anything but their own fortunes and family interests, and it’s entirely possible that they may dabble a little in Sahrawi nationalism if it suits their agenda. Whatever the case, one should realize that Sahrawi politics are a lot more complex and nuanced than either Morocco or POLISARIO will publicly acknowledge, with a multitude of overlapping, fluid and competing loyalties constantly at play.

Finally, one should not underestimate the impact this will have on POLISARIO. The group, while clinging to its cherished status as the internationally recognized representative of the Sahrawis, has been sidelined first by the UN-monitored ceasefire and US/French pressure, and now by the growing autonomous nationalist and anti-Moroccan movement in the territory. The Gdeim Izzeik events are a boon to POLISARIO in that it shows that the current status quo is untenable, and that Sahrawi discontent is mounting – not decreasing. But it also threatens the group’s old leadership, a greying collection of veterans from the days of secular-leftist anticolonial nationalism, by empowering Sahrawi political, tribal, ideological and religious factions outside of their control.

It has already been remarked on by several observers of the conflict that not all nationalists in the territory are affiliated to POLISARIO, and that some are privately very critical of the movement. The main force in the rising Sahrawi nationalist movement inside the territories appears to be this youthful, socioeconomically driven nativist phenomenon, outraged by what it sees as Moroccan cultural invasion, high-handedness and exploitation. The political argument, however, is still structured along the ostentatiously non-tribal, anticolonial line proposed by POLISARIO. In this mix POLISARIO and its exile republic, the RASD, have remained the guiding framework, but events such as those at Gdeim Izzeik may in the long term undermine its near-monopoly on channeling social discontent among Sahrawis. Because, what did POLISARIO actually do during these protests? It propagated their cause, sure, and gave verbal support – but at the end of the day, it couldn’t move from its exile in Algeria, and local leaders were the people who mattered.

If the nationalist movement ultimately spins out of control of the old leadership, that will first and foremost be a disaster to Sahrawi hopes for a nation of their own. Not that the old leaders are much to shout about – old, corrupt, authoritarian, and subservient to Algeria – but without an undisputed center, the movement will almost certainly splinter into exactly the sort of super-fragmented tribal community that Morocco is hoping for. On the other hand, such a development could also help boost the nationalist cause more generally, since even though the RASD is a popular rallying point, many Sahrawis are apparently wary of POLISARIO’s internal stagnation, tribal makeup, and ties to the Algerian regime. The end effect may well be to make the conflict virtually unsolveable due to the competing interests on the nationalist side, while at the same time creating a situation of generalized discontent and street-level militancy rife for outside exploitation by populist, islamist and other groups. That could turn ugly, and the “new” stalemate that would follow is in no one’s interest, not even Morocco’s. It’s one more reason that this conflict needs to be moved towards resolution – even painful resolution – rather than kept boiling until the lid flies off.


16 thoughts on “Guest Post: Alle on Gdeim Izzeik and the Western Sahara

  1. A solid analysis, thank you. The economic demands by the protesters indeed will have been economical-only demands just to keep things civilised. A very wise attitude for unarmed families in tents facing an armed occupation force ready to kill all opposition to that occupation. The camping-movement really has been, as far as I can see, a civilian and peaceful protest. It surprised me and I could not find a good word to describe it until I saw UPES writing about “peace-camps”. Not much different from Gorleben I suppose. But the Moroccan attitude made the world a bit sadder again.

    And the killings of the Moroccan officials also are very sad occurrences. Things could spin into miserable affairs if this is going to be a new line of approach.

  2. I must note Alex Thurston’s great piece in the Christian Science Monitor on this, and a small wave of reporting on these events. As Alex is a regular reader of this site, I think it would be fair to credit Alle in part with inspiring a rare series of English language articles, when this might otherwise have been completely ignored in the Anglophone media.

    That’s the long way of saying “good job”.

  3. Tommy — That’s nice of you, thanks (and thanks to v. Kaas as well), but as much as I’d like to think so, I don’t believe that either AT, in his fine article, or other writers, got it from here.

    There was already some coverage of the camp protest in both the Anglo- and Francophone press, even before the riots erupted, and now there’s a lot more. Mostly, I think, because the protests broke out just in time for the “negotiations”. As media logic goes, this new development is of course mentioned in all the routine articles about the diplomatic stalemate that would have been written anyway, but which are now sexed up with some exotic foreign bloodshed and pushed up to better page placement.

    That timing is actually worth noting regardless of who one considers the main instigator of the crisis. I should have done so in the text, because I do think it must been a factor for both parties. For example, the decision of the POLISARIO to attend the talks, even though the conflict’s traditional logic dictates they should withdraw in protest, was most likely because of the media potential of the riots. Having talks and riots gets more attention than just riots or just talks — the link is quite explicit here, for example.

    • Propaganda Moroccain; enemies of independence who call the Occupied Saharawis “Moroccans” and say there is ‘autonomy’ know this brutality nullifies all claims about our people as “Moroccans”. Saharawis will be free, no kneeling to the Chluh Kings.

  4. cher ami Saharaoui,

    Il faut trouver une solution qui satisfasse tout le monde. Cela fait presque 35 ans que cete histoire dure. Je suis certain que la majorité en Algérie, au Maroc et en Mauritanie cherche une solution où tout le monde s’en sort gagnant et la tête haute. Il y a à manger et boire pour tout le monde. C’est ce qui est important. Le reste c’est du bullshit. Mais comment faire?

    • La solution qui permettrait que tout le monde s’en sorte la tête haute, c’est bien un scrutin d’autodétermination. Les électrices et électeurs ont été désignés, pourquoi ne pas laisser les gens voter ? Pas sûr que la majorité (de qui ? des gouvernants ?) cherche une solution où tout le monde serait gagnant. L’autonomie proposée par le Maroc, que laisserait-elle aux Sahraouis ? Après Gdaïm Izik certainement que le nombre de Sahraouis partisans de cette solution s’est considérablement réduit, voir les déclarations de Mme Ebbi.

  5. En effet Hussain. Pourquoi ne pas laisser les gens voter dans l’honnêtété? Je dois revenir aux 2 rapports de l’International Crisis Group que j’ai lu il y a 3 ou 4 ans et c’est le meilleur rapport sur la situation. Du courage. De mon côté, mon pays (le maure d’à côté) doit chercher une solution pour s’en sortir avec cet AQMI et ceux qui le soutiennent pour des visées géo-stratégiques stupides. Y en a réellement marre de tout ça.

    Sorry Kal. Sometimes you express your feeling better in your “mother” tongue. Lol.

  6. it’s high time for morocco to stop having tea party and chit chat with polisario and it backer if polisario and it clan want to set up a so called (arab sahraoui state)they should head toward east or crawl back to yemen .their brothers and sisters in yemen are busy slicing up the country polisario and it clan should join asap and carve up a slice for them to be called (north south east never west arab democratic polisario hadramout or yemen state) and morocco will be the first to recognize them as a state.

  7. I’ve just seen an article in Mediapart (France) telling a different version than the video I placed here. To look at the article and to share it with you, I has to subscribe with 9 euros a month. Hope you can access the link, otherwise you can subscribe for 1 euro for 15 days. Anyway, Mediapart is worth reading. Particularly to follow-up on France with some articles on Sahara-Sahel. I felt forced to do so in te event that the video is a propaganda. I am not in the propaganda business: just a Mauritanian trying to follow-up on what is going on around so that decent people can speak loud and put this AQIM business behind our back. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s