Limited perspective much?

[ The Arabist has commented, so why not I? ]

Harvard’s MESH blog is an important resource for scholars and for students of the Near and Middle East. It is nevertheless heavily biased, particularly on Levantine affairs, and its discussion of the Maghreb is grossly underdeveloped. This is perhaps a reflection of American Middle Eastern studies generally, in which the study of the Levant is both emotionally and ideologically skewed from several vantage points, each competing with the other for the ear of policy makers, the media and students. This leaves the study of the Maghreb to be engaged only in passing, usually as it relates to some facet of whatever wrangling the Levant has found itself in. Compared to European analyses of the the MENA region, such assessments are vastly inferior, if at all present.

It also has a curious habit of publishing shoddy postings by Raymond Ibrahim or other authors who peddle crude, base and grudging analysis of the region and its religions and peoples. It bears a heavy ideological bias towards Israel, and many of its contributors tend towards the right. This is not to say that the contributions of MESH’s members are not valuable. Much of the work found on MESH is of the highest quality and offers readers important insights into the region.

But it is lacking in diversity in the sense that it includes few North Africa specialists and rarely discusses the region. Following with this lack of specialists, it also includes a lack of postings on the Maghreb all together. Searching MESH for “Algeria,” and “Morocco,” turn up four posts, none of which deal directly with those countries. “North Africa,” “Maghreb/Maghrib,” and “Tunisia” all turn up no postings. Libya returns several postings, all of which mention it only in passing or in the context of its former nuclear program. This lack of interest is characteristic of American Middle East studies, where the “MENA” region often extents only so far as interest in Israel, Palestine or one’s personal ethno-religious background can be examined, as opposed to American national interests or regional and global trends. Therefore, MESH is guilty of geographic bias to the same extent that most MENA/ME specialists and centers are. At the same time, it reflects many of the worst of its contributors in its heavy ideological bias. Not all of its posts are so dreadful, but one must take care to parce through them, else he becomes rather quickly dissolutioned with it.


6 thoughts on “On MESH

  1. The bias for the Masreq is very apparent in language studies as well. Students of Arabic tend to make the rounds to different countries and ocmpare notes. Egypt, Syria, and Yemen are all considered good places to study, but Morocco gets shot down because if you learn the Ammiyya no one’s going to understand you outside of the Maghreb.
    “How long have you studied?”
    “A year in the states, and 6 months in Morocco, but I mean, that doesn’t really help.”

    There’s a thought that Maghrebi Arabic is kind of useless since no one will understand you once you leave the Maghreb.

    But of course the French are going to be more interested in studying the Maghreb – just as the US has more “vital interests”in the Levant, it becomes the focus of US ME studies.

  2. oriontalista:
    your allegation are just fat lies, i’am french and you should know that the arabic language is the same learned in whole arab wold, you are talking about the ‘argot’ or streets language, please don’t show your hate regarding morocco in this website, morocco is far the beste arabe country, or berber country in the midle east. we are not talking about interests, here sir ‘again’ why arabs learn western lenguages is not for interest ‘ i suppose’ sure it is they wants to travel and live here, and make busisness, so stop you ‘mia culpa’ and stop your nonsens conclusions.

  3. thank you Mr Jean, people don’t use thier brain to think aparently, jsut the UMA project the oil maghreb countries are against this project, usa should free those countries like they did with iraq, because the world is changing and those stone heads, should be banned.

  4. Jean Louis/Jalal Nali,
    It is unwise to pose as two different posters whilst using the same email address while registering to make your comments. This makes it very obvious to me that you are making fake posts and multiple identities.



  5. Seems like you’ve contracted mad troll disease. I assume that “Jhon Mahony” is the same guy as well, and that they’re all “Real Sahara Watch” from my blog. He’s posing variously as Moroccan, French, American and as a MINURSO observer, but the persistent misspellings of his own pseudonyms — and the eye-rolling lunacy — tend to give the game away.

    Here’s Patient Zero.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s