Jesus depicted

An Iranian’s vision of Jesus’ life stirs debate,” (from 29 April) brings some thoughts to mind. Firstly, it tends towards treating the presentation of the Islamic view of Jesus (عيسى,`Issa) as if it were any different than presenting the Christian view of Jesus. In what way is this film different than Passion of the Christ? Few Westerners will probably see this movie, though this has not stopped some Christian writers/bloggers from angrily commenting on it, where as many thousands of Muslims saw Passion of the Christ with little controversy. The Catholic version of Jesus’ story is in direct conflict with the Muslim one; Muslims nevertheless watched the film where ever it was available, as it depicted the life of a Muslim prophet albeit from a different perspective. There was at least one Muslim actor in the film. Since Christians regard Jesus as the Messiah, many of them will probably take this view as an insult, as is mentioned in the article. The article presents the film’s sense of Jesus as if it were novel. It is not. It has been the view of Jesus for millions, and now about a billion or so, Muslims for a thousand odd years. It is an interesting perspective on the Muslim Jesus.

Secondly, it seems rather surprised that an Iranian film would make use of a rather “Western” physical template for the appearance of Jesus. There is no discussion of the theological views of the depiction of prophets, a quite lively debate among Muslims and between them and non-Muslims.  All Muslims agree that depictions of Muhammad, the messenger of God, should not be made, though they disagree on to what extent this should be followed. Some Muslims, especially conservative Sunnis, go further and take issue with the depiction of any prophets, including Muhammad’s companions. During the Cartoon crisis, I recall hearing more than one interviewed protester stating that he was not only opposed to the depiction of Muhammad, but “all prophets” as well, including Jesus specifically. I wonder how these men would react to this depiction Jesus. Shias tend to disagree with Sunnis on issues of iconography and quite often display prominently depictions of such figures as the Imams`Ali, Husayn, and so on. Muhammad is never depicted in the iconographic manner that these fellows are. I bring this up because, as the film is an Iranian production, it is fair to presume that it will follow Iranian Shia religious cultural norms. The depictions of Islamic historical figures seem to always follow a similar template: long hair, excessively fair skin, and angular Caucasian features. These are identified with purity, piety, beauty, and other desirable traits in most Middle Eastern cultures. The cast of actors in the excellent 1977 film Al-Risala (“The Message,” known in English as Mohammad, Messenger of God) consists of actors generally following this template, excepting of course Bilal bin Ribah, who was portrayed by Johnny Sekka in the English language version and by a Sudanese actor in the Arabic language version. The Iranian actor playing Jesus in Jesus, Spirit of God has redish hair and very European features. The Western interpretation of Jesus has currency the world over, largely due to the dominance of Western popular culture (through conquest and resultant missionary efforts, and popular culture). In any event, the article reminded me of this post at the Angry Arab:

Since I was a kid, I used to see this version of an imagined picture of Imam `Ali Bin Abi Talib [ . . .] I first thought that it was the picture of a Western movie star. And notice that he resembles the European imagined picture of Jesus Christ. Ali was born in Mecca and must look like Saudis*, just as Jesus must look like Palestinians. But alas they want their prophets and Imams to look like the White Man–preferably the Swedish White Man.

It should be remembered that many Arabs and Iranians look quite Western. While giving a Power Point on the Ba`th in Syria, a classmate asked, quite seriously, “How did a white guy get to be the President of Syria?” She was referring to Hafiz al-Assad. I responded that this happened in the way that a black man became president of Egypt (Anwar Sadat): by purely undemocratic means.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

4 thoughts on “Jesus depicted

  1. “I responded that this happened in the way that a black man became president of Egypt (Anwar Sadat): by purely undemocratic means.”

    Ha! Good answer.

  2. There are several depictions of the prophet Mohammad in Islamic art.

    Most muslims who were not against the depiction of Jesus in the series are also not against the depiction of Mohammad, as both are prophets. Ayatollah Sistani recently released a fatwa stating that the depiction of the prophet mohammad in movies and TV series is allowed so long as it is done tastefully.

    Iranian TV portrays Jesus as fair and with caucasian features because most Iranians are fair with caucasian features.

  3. Iranian TV portrays Jesus as fair and with caucasian features because most Iranians are fair with caucasian features.
    Indeed, the German Nazis described the Nordic racial type which they idolized as “Aryan” — a word cognate with “Iran”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s