NYT on Kuwait

In a region where autocracy is the rule, Kuwait is a remarkable exception, with a powerful and truculent elected Parliament that sets the emir’s salary and is the nation’s sole source of legislation. Women gained the right to vote and run for office two years ago, and a popular movement won further electoral changes.

According to Freedom House, and common sense, Kuwait is not an “exception” to the autocratic rule: Its regime falls right within the norm, save for a few exceptional institutional features, most of which are of recent advent and of a tenuous nature. It was only last year that the country moved to the category of “partly free” from “not free.” On women’s rights, Kuwait is still within the regional norm as well. While the Kuwaiti endeavor is certainly interesting, the article would have done much better to have focused on the actual conduct of “democracy” in Kuwait, rather than focusing on the economic side almost exclusively, neglecting matters of human and civil rights which are still routinely abused in the statelet.

4 thoughts on “NYT on Kuwait

  1. Nadia,
    There shouldn’t be anything on the old site you cannot read here; all of the posts have been imported to WordPress. That said, I am sorry but I will not change the redirect on the old site because it requires that I sift through the HTML and unistall the code that activates the redirect, which was done purposefully and with some difficulty.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s