Notes RE: The Mauritanian Baʿth

What follows is a series of notes on the general outline of the history of the Baʿthist tendency in Mauritania. The information below has been gathered from primary and secondary sources, especially conversations and documents. Apologies for the lack of specific citations for each item; some of these are the result of problems transferring footnotes or internet links that have been consulted but are now dead and some are from conversations with individuals who cannot be identified. It is imperfectly semi-chronological because it is pieced together from notes taken at various times over relatively long periods. Updates and clarifications will follow.

1. In Mauritania, as in other Arab states, there were historically two strands of Baʿthist politics. Baʿthis were a minor factor in Mauritanian politics until roughly 1991, though their membership continues to recycle throughout Mauritanian society. The Arab Socialist Baʿth Party was founded at Damascus in 1940 by Michel Aflaq and Salah al-din al-Bitar. The party has been a strong force or ruling party in Syria from 1963 and Iraq from 1968, in both instances as a part of military regimes. Both countries backed Baʿth parties in various Arab countries over the years, often in direct competition. From around 1981 till the present there has been a weak Syrian strain and a stronger Iraqi variant from the early 1970s each supported by the embassies, cultural, student and aid programs of Syria and Iraq, with considerable variation over time. Mauritania was sufficiently far from either of the Baʿthist states that the influence of the Baʿth has been weak historically. Small numbers of Mauritanian students traveled to Syria for higher education in the mid to late 1970s; even smaller numbers of soldiers and technicians were trained in Iraq during the 1980s. The Iraqi strain was by far the most influential, well organized and consequential of the two and enjoyed more official patronage. Both strains continue to exist, though they are of limited force organizationally.

2. A Mauritanian student, like all others entering Syrian universities, would meet with a Syrian intelligence officer on enrollment. He would have his personal information collected and was usually offered membership in the Baʿth Party. According to those familiar with the times, perhaps 20% of Mauritanian students returned from Syria committed Baʿthists with others having joined out of passing interest. The majority of those who became party members did so to enjoy privileges while in Syria. On arrival home in Mauritania, these youths would go to work setting up the pyramidal clandestine structures characteristic of Baʿthist organization — usually among secondary school boys. These Baʿthist cells grew rapidly in Mauritania’s secondary schools at the same time that Iraqi Baʿthists, Nasserists, communists and black nationalists (FLAM) were recruiting and pollenating. As Baʿthis often do, the Mauritanian Baʿthis were secretive and kept their membership secret. It is well known, though, that the Syrian set was poorly organized and lacked active patronage from the Syrian government until Ould Tayya began to normalize relations with Israel in 1995. Syrian interest in the Mauritanian situation peaked around 1999. They laid low during the purges of the middle 1980s and even lower during the purges and racial violence in the early 1990s. Their active membership never grew beyond the low thousands and the ceased to function as an organized group by the time of the Ould Tayya “transition” in the early 1990s; they were always outnumbered by the Iraqi Baʿthists and were almost exclusively civilians. Their membership moved off into other directions, joining the establishment opposition groups (the RFD, UFP, etc.) or the Islamist tendency, as well as the PRDS. Though their organized activities are generally obscure Syrianist Baʿthis have been active in the cultural and social sphere in recent years, though not as Baʿthisper se. Mauritanians that have studied in Syria note that their debriefers knew the names of various Mauritanian tribes and clans, often knowing a visitor’s family background from his last name alone. What official state support exists for the Baʿthis comes through the embassy, though it is vastly limited financially.

Contacts with the Baʿth National Command, according to local sources, run through the Syrian embassy at Nouakchott (which is soon to have a cultural center) and perhaps the various Syrian “workers” round the country. In recent years, especially since the 2005-2008 transition and democratization, the Syrian Baʿth has made some forward moves, due to increasing interest from Damascus. This year, local Baʿthis in the Syrian track were invited to a reception at the Syrian embassy where they met with Abdullah al-Ahmar (Assistant Secretary General of the Syrian Baʿth) this summer. Al-Ahmar praised Ould Abdel Aziz’s decision to break relations with Israel, saying that since doing this Ould Abdel Aziz has “came to open an area of convergence between the people and the government, as well as between Mauritania and other Arab countries, and established also strong relations between the Baath Arab Socialist Party and ‘the Party for the Union of the Republic’ [sic]“. He also noted cooperation agreements in line in the cultural field especially. (Other, minor, political parties voiced their support for Bashar al-Assad in the month of his visit; Tawassoul even signed a cooperation agreement with the Syrian party in March.) It is probable that elements in the Syrian tendency will see their influence grow within ruling circles as economic and political ties with Syria grow, though one must consider that as circumstances change Damascus’s orientation could be drawn elsewhere leading to neglect.

3. The Mauritanians who traveled to Iraq in the 1970s and 1980s were generally military men. There were perhaps tens at first and hundreds of by the time relations between Mauritania and Iraq turned sour after the first Gulf War. The first Baʿthi cells, according to their laudatory internal history, was founded in 1968 and officially organized in 1972. The Baʿthis themselvs divide their existence into two periods: the foundation (1986-1982) and the deployment (1982-1990). Few details circulate about the period from 1968-70; most information available focuses on activities from the middle-1970s onward. The Baʿth had set out in earnest in the early 1970s, with the help of the Iraqi embassy, though its first clandestine congress did not take place until 1976, which established its posture towards the Syrian tendency, the Western Sahara and created its hierarchical structure. Programmatically, the early Baʿth was focused on Arabization in educational and cultural policy, nationalizing Mauritania’s iron ore mines, ending slavery and increasing workers’ rights (relative to foreign workers); they resisted efforts by the Ould Daddah regime to co-opt them, though they spent much time strategizing how to infiltrate the Mauritanian People’s Party and state institutions. After the 1978 coup, they began activities aimed at expanding among the Haratine, even distributing a pamphlet titled “The Baʿth and the Haratine,” demanding that the junta create an anti-slavery law, writing that “Arabism is not reliant on race or color.” (One should note the appeal of Arabist ideologies to many Haratine leaders.) In these early stages, the Baʿthis participated in joint efforts with the UFP and Nasserite factions. The Iraqi Baʿthi clique’s leader was Mohammed Yehdih Ould Breideleil, who was jailed in the 1982 purge (he was arrested for the first time in 1970) and released in 1984. A journalist by training, he is well known as the intellectual leader of the Baʿthi strain in Mauritania. Often expressing himself in excellent French, he merges the cerebral and political personalities of both ʿAflaq and Bitar. He was a constant in many of the Baʿthi transformations overtime, serving in multiple posts for brief periods in several governments. The Baʿthis spent much of the 1970s “beginning to penetrate the educational institutions, the workers and their camps through debates and discussions with their competitors.”

In the early 1980s, Mauritanians who had been sent to Iraq for training when the Iran-Iraq War began were offered a chance to fight on the Iraqi side, which some did, but the majority returned to Mauritania. The party faithful concentrated their efforts at infiltrating the military governments from 1978-1984 and some of its members gained positions near the junta after the volley of coups. What success they had were checked by suspicion and repression. Ould Breideleil was Information Minister under Ould Salek’s junta; he was reprimanded for playing Qurʿan recitations in mourning of Houari Boumediene’s death instead of government programing. Ould Haidallah had appointed Ould Breideleil as the governor of Trarza in 1980 and then as secretary general of the presidency and dismissed him (and the rest of the civilian cabinet) after the 1981 coup attempt. Ould Haidallah had some of these Baʿthis harassed after the 1982 coup attempt; he promoted others (Ould Haidallah repressed Nasserists as well). From then on the military juntas understood the Iraqi Baʿthis, in general, as a potential threat to the regime, given their conspiratorial nature and external links; Ould Haidallah event so far as to have a group of them imprisoned for espionage in 1982 and 1983 (55 in total), including several women. These men were pardoned by Ould Tayya, who, as an Arab nationalist himself, had great admiration for Saddam Hussein and sought (and got) extensive financial and military assistance from Baghdad, especially after 1989. The extent of Mauritanian-Iraqi cooperation was such that Ould Tayya closed the Iranian embassy in a show of support (and it was not re-opened until the last decade). In 1986-1987, Iraqi Baʿthis had infiltrated the officer corps as well as the enlisted ranks by this time and Ould Tayya saw them as possible coup-plotters, as a result of the economic crisis and popular support for Arabist tendencies. Some were banned from the army in 1987. In 1988, with Saddam’s “green light,” he expelled and banned the remaining Baʿthis from the military as a whole, 417 in all. Banned from the military, these Baʿthis took their cells underground. Iraqi military assistance and popularity grew in the late 1980s, though, the Baʿthis founded favor with Ould Tayya in the education and cultural fields, to the great irritation of black Africans, who rightly saw these men as fervent Arabizers.

As tensions with Senegal rose, Ould Tayya again came together with the Baʿthists who saw the crisis as an opportunity to push the Arabist agenda, while Ould Tayya used the Baʿthists to mobilize against the black African population. They gained important posts in the ministries by 1990, including executive secretary of the CMSN (Ould Breideleil) and are thought responsible for the sacking of some others . They used this period of favor to agitate the population and armed forces against blacks and they helped to set the tone of much of the government’s communications and actions during the crisis, leading to racial killings and communitarian violence; the government White Paper, issued at the end of the 1989 hostilities, displayed heavy Baʿthist influence and rhetoric, laying claim to the southern bank of the Senegal River and repudiating the Senegalese. Baʿthist complicity in the racial incitement during the crisis had lasting impact on both radical and racial politics in Mauritania; this experience helps to originate the use of “Baʿthist” as an epithet and euphemism for racist Moors heard from FLAM and like-minded groups. (Another factor that helped intensify Mauritanian-Iraqi cooperation was a perception that the other Arab states were suspect in Nouakchott, notably Morocco’s perceived support for Senegal in the border conflict, during which King Hassan II called Senegal “brotherly” and Mauritania “friendly,” to the Mauritanians’ great insult).

The Baʿthis’ internal history attributes their success in this period first to “the flexibility of politics in this period, and openness of the various forces had a significant impact in enabling the Baʿthis to penetrate some of their arrangements, or at least to access their supporters and structures, thus opening the door for them to listen to the speeches of the Baʿth.” Secondly, it notes the “greater role” of “the national media of Baʿthi Iraq, this, as well as the personal impact of Comrade Mujahid Saddam Hussein, Secretary General of the Party, and his assignment of moral and material support to the Mauritanian people during the crisis of 1989″.

4. This was their golden age when “the Baʿth was on the tongues of nearly everyone”; they recruited large numbers and enjoyed semi-official sanction. The importance of Iraqi aid and frequent visits from various Iraqi ministries put them in the shadow of Ould Tayya’s close allies. According to a contemporary who attended a meeting of one of the clandestine Baʿth cells in Nouakchott at the time described the atmosphere: a youth (as young as 14 and as old 17) would be invited to a meeting by an elder (a 19-20 year old); they would meet at the home of one of the members, the lights out and the shades pulled; they would read aloud from the writings of Michel ʿAflaq (especially Fi Sabil al-Baʿth), newspapers or speeches (by Saddam) gathered from the Iraqi cultural center; they would discuss the progress of the Iran-Iraq War, Palestine and other topics and perhaps eat; they would then disperse. The Baʿthis caused irritation among traditional religious and tribal leaders by recruiting girls; they did not pioneer this, though the Nasserists generally had more female members. The meetings were always held in secret and were always in small groups, perhaps fewer than ten. Such groups existed in many of the larger towns, though they often had to compete with Syrian Baʿthis and Nasserists (who enjoyed Libyan patronage). These cells would often get into fist fights with one another and Nasserists, as well as FLAM supporters when provoked. Many members of the political class today circulated in the “progressive” Arabist and leftist parties during this period. This changed when Iraq invaded Kuwait; though average Mauritanians supported the Iraqis, Ould Tayya found himself under pressure from the Gulf and France to move away from Iraq under the threat of aid cuts and exclusion. Because the Baʿth had become dependent on Ould Tayya’s tolerance and the Iraqi relationship, their popularity and influence dissipated in the wake of the war and was further devastated when the Iraqi embassy closed in 1994. They lost their influence in the ministries and they did not organize into a single entity after the “transition” to multiparty processes in 1992. Ould Breideleil briefly defected to Ould Tayya’s PRDS, and some Baʿthis took cover in the ruling party achieving marginal security. Some formed their own colonies there or elsewhere. (These would survive the Ould Tayya years, not without repression, and some of them have end up in Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz’s party or block, including Devaly Ould Cheine who served as a minister of state under Ould Tayya and who fled to the Canaries during the 1988 roundups, arrested in the 2003 events for supporting Ould Haidallah.) Many of those in the small Baʿthi underground filtered into other parties and movements, especially the Islamist tendency. A group of Baʿthis defected to the PRDS in 1993; such moves occurred periodically throughout the 1990s. By the end of the 1990s there was no coherent Baʿthi movement in Mauritania and this generally remains the case.

5. Those who kept on as Baʿthis in the 1991-2005 period formed the minor Parti d’Avant-Garde Nationale (Attalia) under Ould Breideleil, though the party was banned in 1999, after criticizing the government for opening relations with Israel; in the same month Ould Tayya severed diplomatic relations with Iraq. The internal narrative about the 1990s is one of “physical and psychological torture,” “elements of the leadership slumping toward the bosom of the ruling regime, a decision rejected privately by the third and fourth generation,” whose members took clandestine roles in other political parties and movements. Most interestingly, they admit that the party was unprepared for the transition to the multi-party system and suffer “difficult circumstances” as a result. The 1991-2005 period was generally one of light co-optation and repression. On multiple occasions they were rounded up, arrested and jailed in large numbers, especially in 1995, though they released a year later. Ould Breideleil was arrested with in 1996, when he was secretary general of parliament, with several other Baʿthis and acquitted. In 1997 they joined the Front of Opposition Parties (FPP), with Ould Boulkheir’s APP and several other opposition parties. They were aggressively opposed to the opening of relations with Israel in 1999; that led to more repression and their being banned. They again reorganized (unofficially) into Nahoud, headed by Mohamed Ould Abdellahi Ould Eyye and agitated around the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which led to still more repression and arrests for forming illegally and because of Ould Tayya’s now closer relations with the United States. This was a key period in the early stages of Ould Tayya’s ultimate downfall and the anti-Baʿthi crackdown came around the same time as Saleh Ould Hanena’s attempted coup; some have noted that an important component in Ould Hanena’s maneuver was a tank unit that allegedly included many Baʿthis and used Iraqi tanks. This is the dominant narrative among many in the west but demands clarification.

Ould Hanena himself was not and is not a Baʿthi. And the cabal around him was not motivated by deep loyalty to Saddam Hussein and it is likely the myth of a Baʿthi-Islamist coup was conjured up by the regime for wholly pragmatic reasons. In the moment, Ould Tayya tried to play the coup with the terrorism card, using it to justify crackdowns on Islamists (Ould Hanena also had links to Islamists, especially the Ikhwanis who later backed him for the presidency in 2007) and other opposition elements — such as Ould Hanena’s Oulad Nasser tribe — though he had started much of this before the coup. He did arrest Baʿthis following the plot but the core group were not Baʿthis; and by this time practically all of the Baʿthists had been purged from the armed force and soldiers were fired on suspicion of just knowing Baʿthis. It is thus unlikely that the tank unit mentioned included Baʿthis, despite the Iraqi origin of its hardware. Important Baʿthis were part of Mohamed Khouna Ould Haidallah’s presidential bids in 2003 and 2007 (Ould Haidallah is not a Baʿthi). When he was arrested after the election, so were these Baʿthis who had supported his candidacy. Their motive for supporting Haidallah was not ideological, though; they were opposed to Ould Tayya and had no interest in Ould Daddah, the other major candidate and out of tribal solidarity (note that many of the Baʿth’s prominent leaders hail from the north of the country, where its many of its earliest cells were established (notably at Atar, Nouadhibou, Akjoujt and Zouerate). In any case, the political motivations behind the 2003 movement were mostly insider disagreements, rather than ideological ones. And it should be noted that Ould Tayya played the coup as a move by Islamists and Baʿthis as a way of strengthening western, especially American, support and much western analysis and media attention took this as fact; the men involved in 2003 plot were themselves generally of the Nasserist bent with important support from Islamists.

6. It deserves mention that many of the youth who had been Baʿthi foot soldiers and recruiters in the 1980s filtered into the Islamist groups in the 1990s and 2000s. The nexus was not just Israel; the Islamist discourse touches the same pieces of Arab identity that Baʿthism does, especially in the Mauritanian context. For these activists, Arabism and Islamism defend and promote similar components of Arab-Muslim identity and communitarian tendencies; the key difference is in the Baʿthi emphasis on the Arab nation as opposed to the Islamic one. This is not to conflate either ideology but to speak to the important over lap in world view between Arabism and Islamism that existed in the minds of many Baʿthis turned Islamists. Further, from a practical standpoint Islamist and Baʿthi activists often have common cause in education and cultural policies, both favoring Arabization. At the same time, though, this is not the general flow of things: Baʿthis generally tend to be secular in outlook, Nasserists less so. Those drawn to the Arabist  tendency without a secularist pre-disposition often select into the Nasserist camp, which has no set dogma where religion is concerned in the way the Baʿth does. Furthermore, the internal discourse among many Mauritanian Baʿthis speaks of a “strategic alliance” with “progressive forces,” the parties of the historic and recent left and their efforts to influence state policy indirectly through other factions, their “flexibility in dealing with political partners”.

7. In the post-2008 period Sawab, a small Baʿthi party of the Iraqi trend, had supported the coup and Ould Abdel Aziz’s candidacy for president. In early 2009, Ould Abdel Aziz’s campaign broke contact with them; their leader, Abdessalam Ould Horma then announced his support for Ahmed Ould Daddah that February. Ould Breideleil is one of the party’s chief ideologues. The party emerged during the post-2005 transition but found itself divided during the presidential race; Ould Breideleil supported Zein Ould Seidan, while another of the party’s founders, Ismael Ould Amar, supported Ahmed Ould Daddah; the two departed over the return of refugees from Senegal and over economic policy. These divisions led many to believe the party was in dire straits, rife with internal divisions as a triage of leaders rushed to back different presidential candidates.

Sawab generally operates with the Nationalist Islamic Action Front, a coalition of small Arab nationalist parties, which includes Nasserists and Islamists (including Ould Henena’s Hatem), with some support from Libya. Perhaps its closest foreign relationship is with Morocco whose officials receive the party’s leaders frequently and whose claims to the Western Sahara (and at one point Mauritania) Ould Horma (and Ould Breideleil) publicly supported in from 1970s. In March 2010, in reaction to the Swiss minaret ban, the party urged Arab leaders to cut ties with Switzerland in response to “the continuous aggression of the Christian west and Zionists.” It operates as a part of a long, thin populist tendency that focuses on areas of convergence between Islamist and Arab nationalist rhetoric and identity politics. It identifies the Arabic language with Islam in a traditionalist and typically Baʿthi way; it identifies Israel and imperialist power politics as one of (if not the) primary enemy of the Arab nation; it views Mauritania as a part of an Afro-Islamic society that accommodates legitimate and indigenous Arab and African traditions as opposed to a grand Francophonie; and so on.

Sawab focuses much of its efforts on education and cultural policy; the phasing out of French with Arabic and more attention for national languages. They support aggressive anti-slavery laws and educational programs for freed slaves. Their rhetoric makes attempts to be conciliatory and multicultural; their youth recruits include many “arabisants,” students educated in Arabic who often feel themselves to be at a disadvantage because of the privileges held by their “francisant” peers. Many of these young activists were involved in the language protests in the high schools and at Nouakchott University in the early summer, which at times devolved into violence. The party has been of use to Ould Abdel Aziz in helping to facilitate cooperation with Morocco and Libya, its chiefs (with others in the Nationalist coalition) making periodic visits to Rabat and Tripoli. The party’s opponents have labeled it bigoted and chauvinistic (frequently “Saddamist”), especially in terms of its positioning on the language issue and the refugee question. Its links to the historical Baʿth make many suspicious of its motivations and ambitions; at the same time two decades of anti-Baʿth messaging between Ould Tayya and other ideological and political tenancies  make it difficult for the party to reach out to the mainstream. On the one hand, the last three years has made the populist elements of its platform redundant (as with the Islamist parties); what remains are language questions and questions of social equality, especially where the Haratine and black African populations are concerned. These are controversial among all segments of the politically relevant elite and the middle classes.

In particular, their fears of Francophone influence in the country are often perceived as stand ins for  “négrification” and a desire to maintain and further cement Arab supremacy over the country’s institutions. At the same time, Francophone (and Francophile) Arabs view this as a threat to a beneficial status quo that functions as a bargain between Arab and black elites, in which the state holds up an Arab identity while the widespread use of French allows both Arabs and black Africans access to centers of rent distribution, employment and status. And among many black Mauritanians, the argument in favor of  “Arabic and the national languages” over French as a “neutral” lingua franca (as it functions in multiple west African states) is frequently seen as little more than code for Arab dominance. Yet the Baʿthis are not unique in their approach to the language question: this is the position of Tawassoul (the Ikhwan) and the bulk of other nationalist or Islamist parties in the country, and one that is popular among a large chunk of the educated youth.

National identity is an area of relative contestation in Mauritania, thus presenting the radical movements the modest ideological movements with an ideological and social outlet and basis for recruitment. Language and race (and the way they relate to social status and mobility) are major motivators behind ideological politics in Mauritania. The “Haratine question,” for instance, is a subject of hot contention between black and Arab nationalists in Mauritania. the Haratine compose perhaps 40% of the country’s population. The descendants of black slaves, they “belong” to Arab tribes and speak Hassaniyah as their native tongue. The few Haratine political leaders who have come to prominence have done so in coalition with larger parties, generally with their foot in the anti-slavery camp. At a mass level, the major political parties often rely on their leaders’ ability to leverage tribal connections to turn out large numbers of related Haraine voters. In black nationalist discourse, the Haratine are “blacks,” by their color and their origins; in Arabist thinking they are Arabs by culture, civilization and language. The appeal of Nasserism and Baʿthism to some Haratine is that these transcendent ideologies deliberately dispel color and social discrimination against them within the dominant culture (in this sense their attraction resembles Arab Christians’ interest in Arabism).

For the radical Hartani, mainstream parties and movements give lip service to emancipation but act to maintain the status quo. The radical movements do away whole sale with the the problem, rejecting gradualism and eliminate the numbers game that plays a tug of war over the Haratine in order to justify or legitimize the political ambitions of the black African and Arab elites. In reality the radical nationalist tendency effectively plays into that very mix by accepting its terms and defining politics in terms of Mauritania’s (Arab) identity, arguably with the Haratine as a decisive element in the struggle. Among politically active Haratine, there is a pragmatism that tends away from radicalism or dogma and attempts to leverage all of these forces toward further emancipation. For that reason, the Baʿth has been somewhat less successful than the Nasserist tendency in recruiting Haratine. Additionally, Haratine leaders spend much time trying to get elements of the religious establishment to more forcefully reject “Islamic” justifications for the continuation slavery, and as a result the Baʿth’s secularism make it somewhat less useful as an organizing or galvanizing principle; on top of that, Nasserism enjoys broader sympathy among the Arab political class and is thus more successful as a means of making common cause for a severely marginalized group. Furthermore, it is in some ways easier to propagate to a mass audience because of its ideological simplicity (and because it makes no revolutionary claims about religion). One must consider the dense and abstract character of the Baʿth’s take on socialism and even freedom as laid out in its literature when assessing its ability to recruit from marginalized groups or within a population where schooling has been limited and literacy rates low. And ideological politics continue to struggle, in general, in a society dominated by tribalism and traditional elites.

About these ads

15 comments

  1. Dear Kal,
    You are apparently have insiders from the ba’thist ,but the interview done by the Syrian for the new students is just part of their internal system and applied to all students not only Mauritanian ,and the Mauritanian enrolled in the ba’ath to get some privilege after they comeback to Mauritania they just being absorbed in the tribal influence …..good analysis..but there is always other side of the storyline…

    1. Very true. It is mentioned that all students enrolling in Syrian universities were interviewed in the posting, and that most joined just for benefits while in Syria. Maybe this can be clarified. Thanks for the feedback Maur.

      1. We know for sure Ba’athísts approached students in France and they become part of their network once back home. During the questionning of Hanena and Co after their coups attents, most of the coup plotters were encouraged to engage in the army to prepare regime change 20 years later. Don’t know if Hanena was ba’athist or a nasserist, but he was close to Ghadaffi and I think he is still.

        This is from me, completely ignorant on these matters. Thanks Kal and still reading for the 3rd time.

  2. I’ve already said this privately to Kal, but let me repeat it: really great post. Lots of hard-to-find info, so lots of credit to Kal for digging it all out.

    And, I don’t want to be trolling, but in other news, Jeremy Keenan, is — no, not institutionalized, but back for another rerun of his conspiracy theory: http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/briefings/2010/11/201011112161535322.html

    Among other things, we now learn that there has been a genocide of Touareg in northern Niger, orchestrated, of course, by Nigerien-DRS provocations, to further THE GREAT PLOT.

    The Saharan Axis of Evil (Washington-Algiers-Niamey-Waziristan) will apparently stop at nothing to tarnish the good name of Touareg tribal militias.

      1. A great interview from ATT of Mali. Looks like peace is coming with Mauritania and Mali initiative to stop the game up North. When Algeria and the US joining in? How come France accepts Droukdel linking AQIM with Ossama who is dead around mid-October 2001 according to Benazir Buthoo and her husband Zardari? Something not right here.

        http://www.cridem.org/C_Info.php?article=49534

      2. Looks like mafia work. Happens with some frequency in northern Algeria that businesspeople or others are kidnapped by criminal gangs.

  3. I don’t believe that Oussama is still alive. So linking the GSPC transformation into AQIM through Oussama and Droukdel telling the French to negotiate the release of the Arlit hostages is just bogus. What do you think? Let’s be serious here.

  4. Thhat was my first thought when I read the Reuters stuff, Kal. I think the mafia is very strong these days that states can barely do anything against them. They should have accomplices all over the the law enforcement people in all the countries. Look at the airs cocaine landing between Mauritania and Mali and no government is giving a convincing explanation. Sure the same is going on in the other countries of the region. kind of Mexico.

    1. Tidinit, there are no links between Polisario and AQMI. Here Daniel Benjamin
      Ambassador-at-Large, U.S. State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism, press conference from 17.11.10:

      http://fpc.state.gov/151048.htm

      QUESTION: Good morning, Ambassador. My name is Pedro Rodriguez from Diario ABC of Spain. Two questions: One, the Government of Spain has paid a great deal of money to – ransom money to terrorists in the Maghreb and to pirates in the Horn of Africa. Are you concerned about this? How is your gentle persuasion – how are you dealing with this?

      And my second question is about Western Sahara. Last week, we have an escalation of violence. I would like to know if you see repercussions in terms of terrorists in that particular area. Thank you.

      AMBASSADOR BENJAMIN: Let me take your last question first. In the West – I mean, my view is that most of the violence we’ve seen in the Western Sahara remains the traditional political violence that we’ve seen for some time. We are obviously always concerned that al-Qaida in the Maghreb could expand its operations, but frankly, I wouldn’t quite get it if they were expanding into that region. I’m not quite sure I would see what the up side for them would be. And in any case, we haven’t seen the proof that it is – that that is really what’s going on.

      Let me just say on the issue of Spain, Spain is an absolutely vital counterterrorism partner. We have really close relations with the Spanish authorities. I had the pleasure of seeing the ambassador here recently. It was falsely reported that I delivered a rebuke. That was absolutely not true. So let me just say that Spain is an essential partner, and we believe that a no concessions policy is the way to go.

  5. Thank you Hussein. I have no doubt it. Sahrawi people will never turn their guns against their brothers, sisters and inlaws. Same blood. same genes and same language and history. Particularly when there is no war declared. The problem is those in the middle in the pursuit of I think only money and trying to drag the Sahrawis into this.

    However, Mohamed Abdel Aziz (the Sahrawi, not the Mauritanian) should also speak loudly against AQIM. People have always expected Bouteflika to speak when his peers in Mauritania and Mali speak about this AQIM scourge. Neither M6 and we need leadership here and in not talking about it is lack of it.

    I have in front of me the Menas Sahara Focus of March 2010 and what they are saying is not wrong at all and is really worrying. How to make these people (all of them) sit down, forget about te past (each of them has done wrong) and chart for us a peacefull future? Everyone besides them is tired of this nonsense.

  6. Good post. I don’t know much about Mauritania, but there’s a lot of facts, and even if it were a PR piece, a lot of relevant ground covered.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s