On the Minaret ban
Posted: 30 November, 2009 Filed under: bigotry, Europe, fascism, Francophonie, Hogra, Islam, Muslims, politics, tribalism, Western Muslims 11 Comments »
One should register no surprise that the continent which produced the Inquisition, anti-Semitism, the Crusades and the Holocaust would give rise to a sentiment that would lead 57% of Swiss voters to ban the construction of minarets. It should be even less surprising that this would come round in a country where the largest party in parliament made itself so by posting up images of white sheep bucking black ones off of the national flag. Proponents of the Swiss ban on the construction of minarets say they fear the imposition of sharia law; that the towers rising off of mosques illustrate Muslim dominance over their society. They go on that Muslims, unlike Christians or Jews, make “political and legal demands.” To preserve Swiss culture and law, no more minarets ought to go up. Some feminists, representing the most assuredly misguided sect yet to speak, added that the minaret is a phallic symbol, representing male oppression of women. Cutting minarets from the skyline would, in their minds, take a stand against misogyny. “If we give them a minaret, they’ll have us all wearing burqas,” as one put it. The Muslims don’t believe women to have any worth and we ought to convince them otherwise by keeping them from building vertically, to paraphrase another. We should be eager to catch a flier compelling us to a rally urging a ban on the construction of bell towers and spires, of slender and high reaching sculptures. Such a hope would only yield disappointment, though. For even if we would like to assume the good and honest intentions of the ban — to accept the line of one parliamentarian that the trouble isn’t Muslims as people, but merely the legal implications of their religion — we would be stupid, foolish and criminally gullible to do so. It would be disingenuous to call the majority decision on the matter anything but an expression of popular and growing racism and bigotry in Swiss society. Worst of all is that we may not say that a wretched government is responsible for this violation of religious freedom. It was the Swiss people — though it is better to say the unenlightened among them. Read the rest of this entry »
The Soltani Affair and its possibe implications, I
Posted: 27 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Algeria, balance of power, Boudjerra Soltani, Bougeurra Soltani, Bouteflika, Hogra, Islamism, Muslim Brotherhood 11 Comments »
Here is Soltani’s denial of the torture accusations raised against him by Anwar Abdelmalek. He claims that he was in Yemen at the time he alleged to have committed the act.:
Eclaboussé par une affaire de torture, le dirigeant du Mouvement de la société pour la paix, Bouguerra Soltani, a démenti hier en marge d’une rencontre au siège du parti, avoir participé à une telle pratique.
« Où se pratique la torture, chez moi ou au siège du parti ? », lance tout de go le chef du MSP avant d’ajouter : « Comment aurais-je pu assister à une séance de torture à Châteauneuf. Est-ce qu’un citoyen algérien est en droit d’assister à une telle pratique sans autorisation des autorités concernées ? » Tout en affirmant, en marge d’une rencontre-débat sur la loi de finances 2010, que le plaignant qui l’accuse auprès des autorités suisses a « menti ». Bouguerra Soltani souligne qu’à la date du 1er juillet 2005, qui correspond à celle où Anouar Malek dit avoir été torturé par les services secrets, il se trouvait en dehors du territoire national.
« J’étais en mission officielle à Sanaâ pour participer à la 32e session de la Conférence islamique », indique Soltani en notant qu’après cette mission, il s’est dirigé vers la ville libyenne de Syrte dans le cadre aussi d’une mission officielle. « J’ai toujours en ma possession l’ordre de mission de la Présidence ainsi que le badge pour assister à la Conférence, je peux vous les montrer. J’ai toutes les preuves que du 28 juin au 7 juillet 2005 je n’étais pas en Algérie. » Ceci et d’ajouter : « Je n’ai reçu aucune convocation de la justice suisse. » Pour rappel, Anouar Malek, journaliste et écrivain en exil en France, était au moment des faits chef de service du commissariat politique, et Bouguerra Soltani était ministre d’Etat.
Par N. B.
It is important to ask:
- The alleged incident occurred in 2005: why has Abdelmalek not raised the matter until 2009?
- How consistent is Abdelmalek’s story? Abdelmalek worked in counter terrorism and has accused Soltani of recruiting Algerians to go to Afghanistan. Does he have an ulterior motive and which Algerians are backing him?
- Why was the case filed in Switzerland, where no legal action could be is likely to have been taken?
- What are the political ramifications of the affair? Will it affect the MSP’s standing in the cabinet or parliament?
- Why is Abdelmalek, who claims to have been ordered to carry out actions “against his conscience” pursuing Soltani alone but not other officials?
- Why have Abdelmalek’s comments been published in the pages of ech-Chorouk, which is usually not hostile to the government? Ech-Chorouk is also know to publish sensational (if not false, as in the case of the recent football madness), nutty, anti-Semitic and otherwise wretched stories. Regardless of its wide circulation, why would Abdelmalek publish there?
- Soltani has many enemies in and out of government, and in his own party (e.g., Abdelmadjid Menasra, though he’s actually split from the party). He has faced corruption accusations (for deals with Chinese fishing companies), and made some claims of his own against others. Many see the frequent scandals around Soltani as part of efforts at revenge. If this is one, who stands to benefit from it (beyond Abdelmalek)?
- If the affair ends up discrediting Soltani and his party ends up with a new leader, who is it and does that man have anything to do with what’s going on now?
- What role has Bouteflika or any of the major bureaucratic, military and political clans play in this, if at all?
- Is the case relevant to the average Algerian?
As Houwari points out in the comments of the previous post, its important to look at the Soltani Affair in terms of regime politics. That the chief of a major governing political party would personally direct a torture session is itself a difficult scenario to fathom. Soltani has enemies, Abdelmalek is just one. Abdelmalek’s displeasure with the Algerian regime is mostly focused on Soltani individually, not institutionally — that is, he has not attacked other elements in the regime. Soltani and the MSP are lams before wolves, dependent on stronger factions for their position and authority. At once this could mean that Abdelmalek really is only looking for the person who tortured him or it could mean that he represents another attempt to bring Soltani down from within the regime (either the deep state or even the presidency) — or both. The MSP is in a rough spot of late: several of its ranking members have been implicated in a number of corruption cases and it is likely that they will suffer for having been caught. Is there a connection between Abdelmalek and the series of MSP leaders being exposed for corruption? That Ech-Chorouk is publishing Abdelmalek’s protests against Soltani says that there are powerful people interested in the case, but those reasons are still unclear. More to come.
Boudjerra Soltani: the Brotherhood by day, water-boarding by night
Posted: 26 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Algeria, Boudjerra Soltani, Bougeurra Soltani, Europe, Hogra, Islamism, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslims, terrorism, Third World, torture 3 Comments »
One must necessarily revise his thesis regarding the role of the MSP in legitimizing governmental authority when its leader, Boudjerra Soltani, was nearly arrested in Switzerland for having personally directed a 2005 torture session in mid-October. Such activity does nobody much good in the way of legitimacy, credibility or religious conviction. Soltani denies that he deliberately fled the country on 16 October, when he was in Geneva ahead of a Muslim conference he was to attend in Fribourg. It is alleged that the Swiss assisted in Soltani’s escape, fearing the fallout from yet another North African incident. The victim is Nouar Abdelmalik, a former soldier in the Algerian army. He now lives in France with refugee status, according to TRIAL (the NGO that facilitated his suit against Soltani). Soltani is the head of the Movement for a Society of Peace, the Algerian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Read the rest of this entry »
Addendum I on Mauritanian and Algerian Islamists
Posted: 25 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Algeria, balance of power, Bouteflika, Islamism, Jamil Mansour, Maghreb, Mauritania, Muslim Brotherhood, Muslims, politics, reform, religion, Sahel, Sunnis, Third World 1 Comment »
My previous post regarding the role of Algerian Islamist parties in the post-Civil War period focused primarily on the functional and strategic role of such parties. This is also true of the previous posting on the Mauritanian Tawassoul. The conclusion of both of those posts was that the net affect of these parties, both representing historically marginal political constituencies and tendencies, was to legitimize established political authorities. In their pursuit of position, whatever their intentions or goals might be, have served to offer a glean of Islamic legitimacy to their respective regimes through their commitment to compromise at any cost.
Unfortunately, both posts fail — as I see it — to address what affect these parties’ activities might have on Islamist politics in their countries and some of the less functional and more ideational aspects of their behavior. Both posts under-emphasize the parties’ own agency within the structural limits of Mauritanian and Algerian political society, which is admittedly limited. Read the rest of this entry »
T. Miles puts TMND in his place
Posted: 23 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, AQIM, Francophonie, Islamism, Mali, Mauritania, Muslims, Niger, Sahel, Third World Leave a comment »See Tommy Miles’s critique of my recent post on Newsweek’s Sahel piece, here and here (as well as my responses). Miles is known to this blog for work on the Tuaregs and Mali and Niger. His comments are especially relevant because they offer a strong account of the terrorism issue in Mali and Niger, showing that AQIM and other disruptive Islamist tendencies are significantly weaker outside the Arabophone areas of the region. He also highlights the positive elements of the Johnson piece, admittedly under-severed in my piece. He corrects my post where it is wrong and adds valuable insights, in the spirit of the pretentious bit of Latin on the sidebar.
Newsweek on the Sahel: no news and no use
Posted: 21 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, AQIM, Francophonie, Mali, Mauritania, Muslims, Niger, Sahel, terrorism 18 Comments »
In the 20 November edition of Newsweek, Scott Johnson presents an unfortunate account of terrorism in the Sahel. Johnson sees fit to present readers with an article that brings little enlightenment. The central thesis of “The Terrorist Myth in North Africa,” is to debunk the notion that al-Qaeda “affiliates are growing stronger in other parts of the world, including across the Sahel.” Johnson does not prove this, merely arguing that it is unlikely that a group like AQIM would grow to pose a threat to the international interest in the Sahel. Read the rest of this entry »
“I can break you.”
Posted: 19 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Algeria, Hogra, Maghreb, Third World Leave a comment »On the death of Djamel Kelfaoui, who was told by the officer who killed him “you can take down my badge number, but you cannot do anything to me. I am a soldier, and I can break you.”
Algeria v. Egypt: the story of a distraction, written from Cairo
Posted: 18 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Algeria, Bouteflika, Egypt, foot-ball, Francophonie, Imazighen, Palestinians, sports, Third World, Tomfoolery, tribalism 27 Comments »
O you who believe, stand up as witnesses for God in all fairness, and do not let the hatred of a people deviate you from justice.
Qur’an, 5:8
Foot-ball is something akin to a religion in many countries. Whether in Liverpool or Algiers, Cairo or Freetown, the game can offer men otherwise without much to smile about a sense of mission and contentment. It can also lead to blind and irrational fanaticism. Thus it has been in struggle between Algeria and Egypt for a place in the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. One can find numerous raps smashing Egypt and Algeria. A clever Algerian bit pledges that Algerians would fly to Cairo as a flock of birds, tunnel underneath the pyramids, swim with sharks and parade through Lebanon and Israel barreling through the Rafaa crossing to bring their national team to victory over the people of the Nile. The Egyptians responded to such disses with generally inferior raps on YouTube. Arab rap in general is in its infancy; the Algerian form is more skillful and developed than the Egyptian one, though. Amateur hip-hop, tour bus stoning, game-time fireworks, poisoned couscous and cellphone shop looting aside, Antar Yahia put Egypt out of the Cup thirty-nine minutes in. An avalanche of conspiracy theories and indignation is already on its way on the Egyptian side. The Algerian government, headed by the miniature ex-Minister of Youth and Sports, will bask in the euphoria of having sent the national team to the first African World Cup. The Egyptians will be relieved that their people are too distracted with a foot-ball drama worthy of the most trashy serial to think about actual political and social issues. In either case, the cycle of despotism and vulgarity will continue and the ultimate winners are not the national teams or young men in the street, but rather their governments and them alone. Such are the “politics of sports” in the Arab countries.
The rivalry itself is of no great interest to this blog. The coverage it has received in English media is interesting to account for, though. Be they American or British, English news media wrote the qualifiers from Cairo. Read the rest of this entry »
Mauritanian Islamists: Political Islam beyond the “War of Ideas”
Posted: 13 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Arabs, balance of power, Ely Vall, Engagement, Francophonie, Gaza, Geopolitics, Islamism, Israel, Jamil Mansour, Jews, Libya, Maghreb, Mauritania, Mauritania election 2009, Messoud Boulkheir, Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestine, politics, reform, Sunnis, Third World 9 Comments »
Tawassoul, Mauritania’s principle Islamist political party, announced this week that it would join forces with now ruling Union for the Republic, the party of president General Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz. Tawassoul’s leader, Jamil Mansour, spent the better part of the last year in opposition to Ould Abdel Aziz, who came to power in a coup last August, as a member of the Front for the Defense of Democracy (FNDD), along with other opposition heavy weights. Of those men, Ahmed Ould Daddah, Messaoud Boulkheir, Badreddine and Mansour, he was the first to make moves to “defect” following defeat in the July presidential election. After last week’s senatorial elections, in which the opposition was dealt a certain defeat — Ould Daddah’s RFD lost in its traditional stronghold of Boutlimit — Mansour was seen to be making his best efforts to attach Tawassoul to the new ruling clique.
Tawassoul is, of course, the local affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is similar to the Algerian and Jordanian branches in that it has seen fit to join government and participate in electoral processes of dubious legitimacy and to join forces with governments of equally problematic natures. As an entity it represents an organization as politically minded as any, and unconcerned with long-term political reform inside Mauritania. Its primary interest is to occupy office, for their popular appeal is limited and their survival is reliant on the patronage and favors of sitting authorities and powers. Its political maneuverings bear little resemblance to its platform or stated intentions. This post is the follow up to a previous post addressing the role of the Algerian Brotherhood, the Movement for a Society of Peace (MSP), in that country’s post-conflict politics. This post examines the role of Mauritania’s Brotherhood in the country’s “transitional” politics. Read the rest of this entry »
Upcoming
Posted: 9 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Islamism, Mauritania, Third World 3 Comments »A post on Tawassoul is forth coming.
Tales from the coffers: characteristic behavior
Posted: 2 November, 2009 Filed under: Africa, Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, Recently in Mauritania, Third World 7 Comments »Al-Akhbar reports on Mohamed Ould Bouamatou’s efforts, dating back as far as 2008, to use his bank (the General Bank of Mauritania) to bankrupt Mauritania’s national gas company (SOMEGAZ) through exorbitant rates, which the Mauritanian courts have called usery. It is written that Bouamatou’s bank raised interest rates to 40%, hoping to put the state company to the wall, to the benefit of his own BSA-Gaz. The report is complete with relevant court documents and charts. Bouamatou used similar methods to bankrupt AirMauritanie, before launching his own Mauritania Airways (in conjunction with Tunisair, which has a majority stake, while Bouamatou has 39%). Additional tales from Mauritania and the pillaging of its institutions will follow.


Recent Comments